 |
It's About The Horse The Free Forum for those Doing Parelli - and a whole lot More! "Anything forced and misunderstood can never be beautiful." Xenophon (430-355 B.C.),
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
thebundychick Member

Joined: 27 Feb 2009 Posts: 840
Location: NSW, Australia
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can't get over it Clarissa, its like the growth just stopped! And you're right - they only looked like they were out to 8 weeks AND still stuck fast.
I'm not getting too excited about the new growth yet - just gonna play it by ear and see what comes of it  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mandy'sMarty Member

Joined: 29 Jul 2009 Posts: 587
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Horses generally grow concavity when the ground is soft. It improves their traction in the soft ground. You've just had the wettest winter season you can remember. Wet season makes soft ground.
Horses focus their energy on growing dense winter coats during the winter season when the daylight hours are the shortest. They begin focusing more energy on growing hooves instead of winter coats at the spring equinox when the spring days become equal to the winter days in length.
The last 14 weeks have been generally your winter season. The time when your horses are basically focusing their energy on growing winter coats instead of hooves.
Sounds like your horse is doing what comes naturally. That's a good thing. _________________ Marty
We must be willing to let go of
The life that we planned
So as to have the life
That is waiting for us.
~Author Unknown |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RickB. Member
Joined: 22 Jul 2010 Posts: 106
Location: East Central Illinois
|
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mandy'sMarty wrote: | | Horses generally grow concavity when the ground is soft. |
If that was true, then the 'cure' for every flat soled horse would simply be to keep them on soft ground. Demonstrably, gaining concavity in an otherwise flat sole, is not so simple if even, possible. It would also stand to reason that the converse would be true. ie: a horse with sole concavity living on hard ground should become flat soled. As can be readily demonstrated, this is not the case, all other factors being equal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PasoBaby_CarolU Site Admin

Joined: 31 Jan 2009 Posts: 9038
|
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have to agree with Rick. I have very hard ground all summer...hard pack clay. Even most of the winter it's hard and frozen. Generally my horses (all except one) grow very good hoof with good, healthy soles. They are probably more healthy in the winter when they get some hydration, but all are pretty hard in the summer. _________________ Carol Nudell
Corazon de Oro Paso Finos
"The path to your horse's heart lies through your own."
Rumors are carried by haters, spread by fools, and accepted by idiots. - Words of Wisdom - Mhar
"Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss activities; Small minds discuss people." - Eleanor Roosevelt |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mandy'sMarty Member

Joined: 29 Jul 2009 Posts: 587
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Perhaps I should have qualified my comment by limiting that as an observation to barefoot horses living in the rain forest of the southeastern United States. And perhaps I should have qualified the soft ground as being wet, which is the factor contributing to it being soft.
I have observed this phenomenon in my mare's feet for as long as she has been barefoot. And yes, Rick, I have observed the converse, particularly this summer. Generally more concavity during the wet months of winter and flatter soles during the summer with hard-packed ground. Actually, her soles appear flatter because of the additional sole material that grows to protect and cushion against the hard ground.
This is not just my opinion. I recently asked Todd Jaynes about this phenomenon as he was trimming Mandy. He agreed as he has seen this among the many horses he regularly trims. It was Todd who explained to me about the appearance of the flatter sole being attributed to the additional sole material responding to the harder ground. I assume that most, if not all, of his clients are barefoot. He has clients throughout the southeast US.
Todd has personal knowledge of many more horses than I do. He is AHA certified, Field Instructor & Public Education Clinician for the Equine Sciences Academy, Field Instructor for the United Kingdom Natural Hoof Care Practitioners, and recent presenter at The Functional Hoof Australian Conference in Melbourne last February.
Of course, Rick, as with any observations of horses, it is entirely possible that Todd and I have somehow been observing only horses that are the exception to the rule that "can be readily demonstrated...all other factors being equal". Or perhaps it just depends on the peculiar factors that are common to the barefoot horses that Todd trims. _________________ Marty
We must be willing to let go of
The life that we planned
So as to have the life
That is waiting for us.
~Author Unknown |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RickB. Member
Joined: 22 Jul 2010 Posts: 106
Location: East Central Illinois
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apples and oranges. You said it yourself --
| Quote: | | Actually, her soles appear flatter because of the additional sole material that grows to protect and cushion against the hard ground. |
That additional sole does not equate to a flatter sole, just more retained sole. If the sole was truly flattening due to hard ground, then there would not be a surfeit of sole, rather there would be an actual loss of concavity/flattening of the arch of the sole. Strip out that excess retained sole and what do you find? I'll bet a dollar against a donu7t hole you'll find the same concavity that has always existed. And the converse would also be true. ie: due to the soft ground, the functional sole would go from a flat non-arched configuration to an arched/domed configuration. That phenomenon has never been observed or recorded.
And remember, appearances can be deceiving......
So, until/unless you can provide radiographic evidence of this phenomenon, in either/both directions, with the same horse(s) you'll perhaps understand my skepticism.
| Quote: | | Todd has personal knowledge of many more horses than I do. He is AHA certified, Field Instructor & Public Education Clinician for the Equine Sciences Academy, Field Instructor for the United Kingdom Natural Hoof Care Practitioners, and recent presenter at The Functional Hoof Australian Conference in Melbourne last February. |
Well that and five bucks will get him a cup of coffee at Starbucks.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mandy'sMarty Member

Joined: 29 Jul 2009 Posts: 587
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rick, You are correct. I re-read what I had written and it does appear to confuse rather than clarify what I had meant to say.
Simply stated, I have observed the horse's bare foot to appear more concave on wet, soft ground and much less concave on hard, dry ground. In my part of the world, that translates to a bare foot with good concavity in winter and a bare foot that appears almost flat in summer. (Other locales may have hard, frozen ground in winter and softer ground in summer.) Same horse, same pasture, but different seasons creating different footing. Hard ground, sole fills in. Soft ground, sole exfoliates. Both versions are healthy hooves responding to their environment.
I choose not to disturb the sole. But I am sure that, during my summer, there is retained sole filling in the concavity so that the soles appear flatter than the actual domed arch of the foot's structure.
I did not intend to suggest that in this particular phenomenon, the internal structure of the foot moved relative to the hoof capsule, and thus caused a change in the domed arch of the sole.
I really think that you and I are in agreement. Thanks for calling me on that one. _________________ Marty
We must be willing to let go of
The life that we planned
So as to have the life
That is waiting for us.
~Author Unknown |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thebundychick Member

Joined: 27 Feb 2009 Posts: 840
Location: NSW, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting points on both sides.
I can't really say whether its the wet that has caused this - I mean - he's been barefoot for two years before this, and gone through a fair bit of wet weather in that time, and I've never really picked a difference in his soles - or a difference that I could attribute to the conditions.
But this difference is profound. Its been a year since I embarked on this experiment, and Sante's soles just look amazing.
would love some photography tips though, because I can't catch a break in getting decent photos! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thebundychick Member

Joined: 27 Feb 2009 Posts: 840
Location: NSW, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Front right foot
Front left foot
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thebundychick Member

Joined: 27 Feb 2009 Posts: 840
Location: NSW, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sante was reshod yesterday, its been about 8 weeks I think.
He was very long, very flared, and in dire need of a reshoe.
Can I just say:
I'll get more photo's towards the end of the week, i took a photo's today, but the shadows are all wrong, and basically - you can't see a thing.
Ha! Story of my life.
I'm telling myself over & over again, "Don't get your hopes up, play it cool"
But, I AM happy with how things are going.
Basically, we have 50/50 good growith / split growth. considering the rain we had previously, I am actually surprised that his feet have rebounded to the extent they have.
The MAJOR MAJOR thing that has changed? - I am controlling his feed.
Every single mouthful he gets.
I have changed his feed from a very sweet feed, which I reluctantly put him on when he was really sick and desperately needed to gain weight, and took him back to a "plain" feed, that is, nothing processed, I hand make each feed, he gets no sugar except for the lucern hay i throw him, and even then its fairly sun dried, so I'm not to concerned about it.
But basically, I think the feed is really helping the feet.
When i post photos, you will notice growth rings, and that pretty well explains it.
But, in a nutshell, we are heading in the right direction.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thebundychick Member

Joined: 27 Feb 2009 Posts: 840
Location: NSW, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 6:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry the photos are late!
After I wrote my last post, we had 5 days solid downpour. I procrastinated with his feet, because i was afraid of what I might find.
But to be honest - I'm really thrilled. for what feels like the first time, they've held their own in terms of splits etc.
You can see the growth rings i was talking about before. No doubt from a diet insanely high in sugar, with added insane amounts of lucerne hay.
Looking back, I'd not be surprised if the amount of sugar contributed to the feet these last few months?
Anway.
Regardless of how you look at it - this is where we are - and in my eye - they've never looked so good.
Front Right:
Front left: (must have got a rock stuck in there somewhere hence the second crack - it shows no signs of infection, its clean, so can only assume the rock scenario. This is also the "sick" foot. you can clearly see the line across the hoof that marks when he was sick.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RickB. Member
Joined: 22 Jul 2010 Posts: 106
Location: East Central Illinois
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thebundychick wrote: |
But to be honest - I'm really thrilled. for what feels like the first time, they've held their own in terms of splits etc.[ |
To my eye, the feet looked better in Sept. than they do now.
| Quote: | | You can see the growth rings i was talking about before. No doubt from a diet insanely high in sugar, with added insane amounts of lucerne hay. |
Or, more likely, because the level of hoof care is inadequate and IMO, incorrect.
| Quote: | | Looking back, I'd not be surprised if the amount of sugar contributed to the feet these last few months? |
Oh that it were so simple and easy......
| Quote: | | Regardless of how you look at it - this is where we are - and in my eye - they've never looked so good. |
Which is why it is good that you post photos for those with a more 'impartial eye' to critique.
| Quote: | | Front left: (must have got a rock stuck in there somewhere hence the second crack - |
That crack has been present for quite a while and is not, IMO the result of a 'rock getting stuck in there somewhere'. It is the result of incorrect hoof form and the ongoing incorrect efforts to remediate that.
| Quote: | | it shows no signs of infection, its clean, so can only assume the rock scenario. |
While there may not be any active pathogens, it is far from clean. It is full of environmental debris and that alone would be enough to act like a splitting maul and exacerbate the issue. Until that along with the overall trim and shoeing is properly addressed, you will continue to take one step forward and two steps back.
| Quote: | | This is also the "sick" foot. you can clearly see the line across the hoof that marks when he was sick. |
You would see the 'fever rings' in more than one foot. While this foot may indeed be 'sick', the cause is more focal than diffuse.
Fix the trim, debride the cracks, support the hoof capsule correctly through the use of correct orthotics and you'll get the problems better resolved. IMO, that's going to take a hoof care professional who is much better skilled and trained that whomever is currently providing hoof care for this horse. YMMV
(disclaimer: This posting was authored by Rick Burten and no one else and I take/accept full responsibility for its contents) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thebundychick Member

Joined: 27 Feb 2009 Posts: 840
Location: NSW, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
The feet didn't have growth rings in September, but then again, the feet didn't have any growth in september. His feet pretty well stopped growing, due to the fact that
a/ it was Australia's winter at the time
b/ He had been critically ill
c/ he lost about 100kg
Since June, he has gone from being fed nothing but grass hay, agisted in a paddock with no pick - to being agisted in a paddock with what began as a fairly decent pick, with a daily hard feed extremely high in sugar, as well as lucern hay.
He then had a dramatic diet change *again* two months ago, where i took him off the sweet feed, onto a feed consisting of 50/50 chaff, steam rolled barley, garlic, salt, and soya bean meal. With a Single buiscut of lucern hay.
I'll say again - The growth rings are of absolutely no surprise to me.
Rick, you are looking for different "problems" with Sante's feet to me, its quite obvious.
I see the cracks in Sante's feed, as his achillies heel, if you will.
Its the big fat neon sign over my horses head that says " There is something really wrong with these feet", Even when he was 100% sound, and the cracks were still running up to the coronet - that was my indicator "You're still missing it". I have never *ever* in the 5 years that I have owned him, had the cracks looking like this.
Can you not understand that? You can sit there and criticize clinching methods, and denegrate my farrier from the safety of your computer - but you refuse to see that, We. are. actually. progressing. Very. Very. Slowly.
Is this not progress: .
Yes, I know, being a thoroughbred doesn't help. Being pigeon toed and knock kneed doesn't help. It *really* screws up with the unloading of the wall, and getting a comfortable action for him. But I've actually being going backwards a lot slower in the last 12 months.
If you had taken the time to read my thread on Sante's illness, you would know that he got a virus, which resulted in full body hives, which resulted in a severe case of vasculitis which manifested in his front left leg. He was swollen from the shoulder all the way down to the coronet, He was unable to walk without pain releif for a week, it took two weeks for the swelling to go down & for the scab to lift off the leg, (and even then only because i smothered it in honey every single day) and when it did, it peeled off like a banana, from the knee, all the way down to the coronet. He lost every single hair below the knee.
His leg, was "sick", and it resulted in that hoof growth "peeling back" from the foot. At the time, i was afraid that he was going to actually shed the wall right off.
As long as my horse isn't lame, and he is happy to continue bucking around the paddock (like he does on a daily basis), Then, I think I'll give my "inexperienced" farrier with 30 years skill & training, the benefit of the doubt |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RickB. Member
Joined: 22 Jul 2010 Posts: 106
Location: East Central Illinois
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="thebundychick:95750"
Since June, he has gone from being fed nothing but grass hay, agisted in a paddock with no pick - to being agisted in a paddock with what began as a fairly decent pick, with a daily hard feed extremely high in sugar, as well as lucern hay. [/quote]
Our ' language in common' divides us. I don't know what 'agisted' means. Nor do I understand what 'a fairly decent pick' means.
| Quote: | | He then had a dramatic diet change *again* two months ago, where i took him off the sweet feed, onto a feed consisting of 50/50 chaff, steam rolled barley, garlic, salt, and soya bean meal. With a Single buiscut of lucern hay. |
Regardless, those dietary changes should be evident in all four hooves, not just one.
| Quote: | | Rick, you are looking for different "problems" with Sante's feet to me, its quite obvious. |
Actually, I'm not looking for any problems. I'm commenting on those that are there and that are obvious to me.
| Quote: | | I see the cracks in Sante's feed, as his achillies heel, if you will. |
Those cracks are but a small but not insignificant part of what is wrong, more a 'result' than an 'instigator'.
| Quote: | | Its the big fat neon sign over my horses head that says " There is something really wrong with these feet", |
Exactly. If you have inferred that I meant anything else, I apologize. My contention is that if the physical hoof care was correct, these problems would have, by now, been under better control.
| Quote: | | Even when he was 100% sound, and the cracks were still running up to the coronet - that was my indicator "You're still missing it". I have never *ever* in the 5 years that I have owned him, had the cracks looking like this. |
IMNTBCHO, this problem has dragged on for far too long. I've followed this case for a long time and it seems to me that it should have been resolved long ago. While it is not routine anymore for me to deal with hooves in this condition, I've never had a case that has taken as long to resolve as yours is taking. And I've worked on cases at least as involved and probably more involved that this one. And no, I don't have photographs. I never really got into the habit of photographing my work, which I freely admit if I had to do over, I'd memorialize every d-amn foot I ever worked on every time I worked on it.
| Quote: | | Can you not understand that? |
What I understand is that you've been 'throwing mud at a wall to see what sticks' for far too long. Throughout this ordeal, several people have repeatedly commented on the lack of quality hoof care which you have/are receiving and what they see as the problems with that hoof care. Yet here we are, years later and you're still throwing mud at the wall to see what sticks. Bottom line, you seem to have addressed the dietary needs but you're still not getting the basic hoof issues properly addressed.
Look at the date on the first photo: 18/01/2002. That's almost ten years ago. And yet here you are equivocating and taking umbrage. Sure, the crack looks better now but you gotta ask yourself, 'why ten years'? And, in the current photo, the crack has begun extending back up the wall. Why? I'd wager a dollar against a donut hole that if even a minor resection of the area was undertaken, you'd find there is a lot of debris present and the area it encompasses is greater than what you are seeing when looking at the hoof as is. Were you in my custom, I'd be cleaning that area out regardless of how much overlying wall I had to remove, trimming the hoof(ves) to properly reduce wall distortion in all planes, shoeing with a shoe/orthotic that was actually shaped to the true shape of p3 and provided proper support, probably adding supplemental frog support, and treating the resected wall with a chlorine dioxide product on initially a daily basis and then at least a few times a week basis. Disclaimer: with 'hoof in hand' I might modify that protocol to some degree, but odds are that would be to add to the base protocol I have enumerated, not to subtract from it.
| Quote: | | You can sit there and criticize clinching methods, and denegrate my farrier from the safety of your computer..... |
The work being provided your horse is less than adequate and I'd say that to your farrier's face were he and I in a physical face to face meeting. Though I am far from being recognized as one of the 'gods of farriery', there is little doubt that any self-respecting farrier of my aquaintance would be horrified, embarrassed and probably humiliated if work of the caliber being provided your horse, was attached to him/her.
| Quote: | | - but you refuse to see that, We. are. actually. progressing. Very. Very. Slowly. |
Take off your rose colored glasses and realize that it should not be taking so long and your horse should, by now, have better hooves.
| Quote: | | Yes, I know, being a thoroughbred doesn't help. Being pigeon toed and knock kneed doesn't help. It *really* screws up with the unloading of the wall, and getting a comfortable action for him. But I've actually being going backwards a lot slower in the last 12 months. |
You gotta ask yourself why you're going backwards at all.... And, those conformation issues you enumerate should be no big deal for any farrier(or other hoof care provider) who has the requisite skill, knowledge and ability.
| Quote: | | If you had taken the time to read my thread on Sante's illness,... |
You have just committed a logical fallacy. IOW, what leads you to believe that though I have refrained from commenting, I have not read that thread ?
| Quote: | | His leg, was "sick", and it resulted in that hoof growth "peeling back" from the foot. |
Maybe, maybe not.
| Quote: | | At the time, i was afraid that he was going to actually shed the wall right off. |
All things considered, that might not have been such a terrible occurrence. But, as with most everything equid, It Depends."
| Quote: | | ....I think I'll give my "inexperienced" farrier with 30 years skill & training, the benefit of the doubt |
Consider this. Some farriers learned what they know in their first year in business and then do the same thing for 29(or however many more) more years. Others, learn on a daily basis throughout the length of their career. Which do you suppose describes your farrier? I think you already know my thoughts on that......
You might want to consider joining(if you have not already done so) The Farrier and Hoof Care Resource Center(www.horseshoes.com). The forums for horseowneres are chock full of great advise and information. Further, there are several farriers from OZ that are frequent contributors and you should consider contacting any or all of them to see if they can be of service to you and your horse. Based on what I know of them their work and education, I feel confident in saying that any of them would be a better choice for you.
Here are links to a couple of them.
http://www.farrierkane.com/
http://horseshoes.com/forums/member.php?u=7145 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thebundychick Member

Joined: 27 Feb 2009 Posts: 840
Location: NSW, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2011 11:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thankyou very much for not actually paying any attention to a SINGE THING I'VE WRITTEN.
What part of "I bought my horse in 2006" was unclear??? I have owned this horse for 5 years. Not 10. The dates on the camera are incorrect & up until today have never come into it.
agisted = kept on someone elses property
"fairly decent pick" - actually has grass that isn't very sweet to eat.
The dietary changes ARE evident in all four feet. The two photos of the fronts show growth rings, I haven't posted photos of the backs, because theres nothing wrong with them.
| Quote: | | Yet here we are, years later and you're still throwing mud at the wall to see what sticks. |
He's had Cyteks on for 12 months. In the time previous to that I've gone through three farriers & he's been barefoot. You cannot TRY HARDER THAN WHAT I'M TRYING RICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
| Quote: | | You have just committed a logical fallacy. IOW, what leads you to believe that though I have refrained from commenting, I have not read that thread ? |
The point is - you take EVERYTHING i write, and throw it back at me, as if I'm wrong. A *simple* *obvious* fact, that
I KNOW my horse was critically ill
I KNOW my horse had severe swelling of the leg
I KNOW it affected his hoof growth and mentioned it.
And you come waltzing in, telling me that I'm wrong?
| Quote: | | Consider this. Some farriers learned what they know in their first year in business and then do the same thing for 29(or however many more) more years. Others, learn on a daily basis throughout the length of their career. Which do you suppose describes your farrier? I think you already know my thoughts on that...... |
Step off your high horse, and take a DAMN BIG glass of humility
Who the *hell* do you think you are??? You know NOTHING about this person. You have absolutely NO knowledge of what he's studied, where he's been, who he shoes for, the courses he's done, the forums & conferences he's attended,
I KNOW which type of farrier he is.
And you owe me AND HIM an apology.
There is something we have over here in Australia - its called a professional courtesy... Basically - it means - you don't go bad mouthing FELLOW PROFESSIONALS or criticizing as you have done. It is widely regarded as unprofessional, and extremely bad form.
There is critiqueing someone on a professional level, and then there is criticism on a personal level.
You have crossed the line.
I will say one last time to you:
As long as my horse IS NOT LAME. Continues to athleticize to the extent that he is, shows no signs of apprehension or inability / unwillingness to move. Then I think I will follow this road a little longer.
PLEASE REFRAIN FROM POSTING ANY FURTHER ON MY THREAD. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|